From: Evaluation of sustainability using the AISHE Instrument: case study in a Brazilian University
Theme | Related criteria | Coordinators | Professors | Students |
---|---|---|---|---|
Existence of sustainability in the institution statute. | 1.3 | Sustainability on its way to be included in UPF statute. | Partly agree that sustainability is present in its statute. | Neither agree nor disagree: sign of lack of knowledge about the subject. |
Observance of environmental guidelines by professors, employees and students. | 1.4 | Some members of the academic community pay attention. | Did not agree that the guidelines are observed. | Did not agree that the guidelines are observed. |
Existence of specialists in sustainable development. | 2.2 and 2.3 | The university possesses few specialists and when they do exists is due to self initiative. | The university possesses few specialists and when they do exists it is due to self initiative. | Neither agree nor disagree: sign of lack of knowledge about the subject. |
Level of information about aspects related to sustainability in the field of expertise. | 3.1 and 2.3 | Consider the students have knowledge of only a few aspects related to SD; professors are considered to have knowledge about SD due to individual initiative. | Partly agree that they have knowledge about SD. | Neither agree nor disagree: do not consider themselves informed enough. |
Presence of SD on the curriculum of courses. | 3.1 and 4.1 | Believe that the subjects is not addressed sufficiently once only some subject of the curriculum involve SD. | Partly agree about the existence of SD in the curriculum. | Partly agree about the existence of SD in the curriculum. |
View of SD as something interdisciplinary. | 3.2 and 4.2 | Consider that there is interdisciplinary. | Neither agree nor disagree: this may represent a lack of knowledge of interdisciplinary concept of what SD entails. | Neither agree nor disagree: this may represent a lack of knowledge of interdisciplinary concept of what SD entails. |
Addressing of ethical aspects towards SD. | 3.3 | Only some professors emphasize the need of having sustainable attitudes. | - | Neither agree nor disagree: that believe the ethical aspects are not satisfactorily addressed. |
Contribution of academic research and extension in the knowledge of SD. | 2.4 | Believe that some activities of research and extension involve SD. | Partly agree, once not all are inserted in these activities and state that a more expressive presence could exist. | - |
Relevance of aspects about SD in evaluations. | 4.3 | Believe only some projects include SD elements. | Partly agree. | Partly agree. |
Graduates ability to act in favour of SD. | 3.3 and 5.2 | Believe that not all professors emphasize the importance of SD in professional conduct. | Agree that they are preparing graduates for this. | Partly agree that they are being prepared on the subject. |